We are failing to understand the underlying principles behind the solar-cycle. Just like other fields in the world, science has also been a victim of human ego and corruption. So much that even if it hurts common sense. They will explain something which they don’t understand in the past by something they don’t understand happening in the present. First of all Science does not belong to particular universities, or degrees. Science is the study of nature and utilizing it in human development. Which certainly our main-stream science has failed in.
The only time science becomes relevant is when they go through a preconceived notion. This is why there is so much resistance for a new inventor to survive. At the end of it there is always someone who knows and halts the process from scratch.
Truth is that we need to start from very beginning, from scratch maybe everything we know is wrong. Recently, our sun has begun to fluctuate. The sun-spot cycle of 11 years has come twice this month. Royal Astronomical Society press release from July 9 says that “solar activity will fall by 60 per cent during the 2030s.” they further state that, “We found magnetic wave components appearing in pairs, originating in two different layers in the Sun’s interior. They both have a frequency of approximately 11 years, although this frequency is slightly different, and they are offset in time. Over the cycle, the waves fluctuate between the northern and southern hemispheres of the Sun. Combining both waves together and comparing to real data for the current solar cycle, we found that our predictions showed an accuracy of 97%,”
The problem in this is that we have been observing the sun-cycle from only 400 years. This time frame is very less compared to the time-frame from which our sun should be looked. There are further proofs in scientific studies which have been done as early as the time of Jean Piccard and Phillip De la Hire. Their observation during seventeenth century indicates a solar minimum known as ‘mini-ice-age’ or ‘Maunder Minimum’. No or very less sun-spots during the period from 1610 to 1680. This shows that ice-age has nothing to do with solar-cycle.
This is a known scientific fact that 11,500 years ago till 1.8 million years ago earth went through an ice-age. There have been five known Ice-Age occurrence during the 4.6 billion years of scientific proofs. And scientist has been pointed to sun-spots ever since. This terminology does not even sync in with an ice-age because even when sun has no sun-spot it is equally bright. We require to look into the sun’s cycle once again free from all preconceived notions.
The truth is that we know very less about the sun in itself. Also, it certainly does not corresponds to the fusion-fission model. So widely accepted as the truth in main-stream science. The current fusion-model of the sun fails to explain wide number of things. Solar-cycle is just one of those things.
Current Solar-model fails in explaining more than just solar-cycle
Sun-spots, if you do not know what sun-spot is. Sun spot is an opening into the inner sun which occurs on sun randomly. First of all, if the current model is true then the sun will never have sun-spot it would rather have Bright-spots. Sun spots are dark opening which shows that inside of the sun is dark.
Reduction of temperature on the surface, The temperature of the sun’s atmosphere is 250 million Kelvin while on it’s surface it is only 5778 Kelvin.
Sun is too round to have a gravity wave, Current beliefs in solar study holds the notion that Sun is flat from top and bottom, however. The studies in observational physics shows that it is spherical and not with the canopy top.
Coronal Mass ejection or Solar Flare, mass ejection of plasma from the surface of sun in outer space.
Solar wind, varies with times and further observations shows that it stops completely for some time.
Footnotes: Irregular heartbeat of the sun driven by double dynamo-Press release, Royal astronomical Society Australia